Alex Jones dropped the White Genocide red pill:
Genocide: the deliberate and systematic extermination of a national, racial, political, or cultural group.
You see it called out in the comments sections on YouTube videos, on political websites and occasionally in letters to the editor. You see the term increasingly referenced in Conservatism Inc. videos. And you certainly see the horrifying reality of it through the policies perpetrated by almost every government of the West. It’s “white genocide”—an idea popularized by former economics professor and Reagan Administration staffer Bob Whitaker, who recently passed away. As Whitaker noted, “genocide” does not necessarily mean killing.
According to the 1948 Convention on the Prevention of the Crime of Genocide, the United Nations has a very interesting definition of genocide: “Any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group … ”
- “Killing members of the group”
- “Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group”
- “Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part”
- “Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group”
- “Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group”
The relevance of this to the plight of whites, in the U.S. and worldwide, is obvious. Today, the hard reality is whites are being eclipsed. 28% of the world population in 1950, they are projected to fall to only 9.8% of the population by 2060. By 2050, whites will be a minority in both the U.S. and their indigenous homeland of Europe.
This “diversity” is only being inflicted upon white countries. As Hillary Clinton’s VP nom Tim Kaine put it: “I think the burden is on those of us who are in the majority — Caucasians. We have to put ourselves in a place where we are the minority.”
He doesn’t mean that metaphorically but quite literally. Kaine, for instance, supports Amnesty for illegal immigrants. He even gave a pro-mass immigration speech on the floor of the Senate in Spanish.
The white population of the United States will drop from 90% in 1940, prior to the infamous Hart-Celler Immigration Act, down to 46% by 2065 [America is in the middle of an extreme demographic shift, by Drake Baer, Business Insider, October 9, 2015]. Due to Leftist support of illegal immigration, the Latino population will begin displacing the whites in America. The Latino population will grow from 4.5% in 1970 to 24% in 2065.
According to the US Census Bureau, the white population is contracting at an incredible rate in absolute terms, falling from 211,460,626 to 196,817,552 during the decade from 2000 to 2010. This is a loss of 14,643,074 people in that period alone; almost 15 million. Similar trends are taking place in Europe.
This is significant because whites will be the only ethnicity on Earth without a country of their own. Black people will still have the entire continent of Africa. Asians will still control the entire continent of Asia. Jews will have Israel. Even Native Americans will have Reservations. Whites alone slowly being dispossessed.
The only question: whether this is a deliberate effort or not. Even a casual glance suggests it is.
Japan can have strict immigration laws to protect their bloodline and culture. Israel can have an ethnostate where non-Jews are treated as second-class citizens. But if Lefists see any population of white people, they condemn it as a moral abomination to be cured by “diversity.”
Indeed, white identity in and of itself is seen as unique evil. On college campuses, there are diversity officers and organizations specifically designed to promote black, Latino, gay, Jewish and Muslim identity politics. In communities around the country, you will find innumerable rallies or festivals in celebration of every conceivable cultural or racial identity. And when it comes to immigration policy, nonwhites demand Open Borders on explicitly racial or ethnic grounds. But white Identitarian movements are pathologized and those who practice even implicit white identity politics often suffer violent attacks.
The dispossession and replacement of the global white population in their own homelands is sometimes justified as supposed revenge for colonization, slavery and imperialism. Muslim immigrant Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, then of London’s Foreign Policy Centre, told The Guardian: “The empire strikes back really. There was this extraordinary assumption that white people could go and destroy peoples and it would have no consequence. It astounds me” [The last days of a white world, by Anthony Browne, The Guardian, September 3, 2000].
Of course, this is an implicit admission that Open Borders proponents know mass immigration is bad for whites—and support it for that reason. Also left unanswered: why European nations with no history of empire are forced to accept mass immigration and why non-European nations with expansive histories of imperialism and slavery (including of whites) are seemingly exempt from this historical burden.
In practice, “diversity” means deconstructing Europeans so that whites are ashamed to acknowledge or stand up for their own identity, even in the face of total dispossession and overt campaigns of hatred against them. At the same time, nonwhite identity and racial solidarity is actively cultivated and rewarded by powerful institutions in our society.
A study from Michigan State University found: “African American people who identify more strongly with their racial identity are generally happier”. [Racial identity tied to happiness, study finds, Science Daily, March 7, 2011]
Not surprisingly, as white identity has been so thoroughly pathologized, whites are in spiritual as well as physical decline.
White poverty is all but ignored by the Main Stream Media. [White poverty exists, ignored, by Leonard Pitts, Jr., Miami Herald, October 5, 2014] Whites are experiencing epidemics of depression, suicide and opioid abuse, the so-called “White Death.” The U.S. white suicide rate spiked by 43% among white men ages 45 to 64 and 63% for women in the same age-range since 1999—while the suicide rate for black males actually fell [US suicide rate surges, particularly among white people, April 22, 2016].
Not only are these issues essentially ignored by those in power, when someone dares defend the interests of the white working class, they are vilified by the MSM and politicians alike. [No Sympathy for the Hillbilly, by Frank Rich, New York, March 19, 2017] Whites aren’t just being demoralized and demonized to the breaking point, they are mocked for seeking desperation solutions to this existential despair.
What’s more, even as their own numbers decline, whites are compelled to subsidize a huge population explosion in Africa and importing such massive numbers of Third Worlders that they threaten the survival of the white population. “More than half of global population growth between now and 2050 is expected to occur in Africa,” said a United Nations report on World population prospects. “Of the additional 2.4 billion people projected to be added to the global population between 2015 and 2050, 1.3 billion will be added in Africa.”
A study at Clemson University found that foreign aid from white countries has enabled this population growth [Does Foreign Aid Induce Population Growth? By David Cuberes and Kevin Tsui, Clemson University, July 2007]. At the same time, our leaders tell us we can’t afford to have our own children and that more children are bad for the environment.
The African and Middle Eastern migrants flooding Europe are mostly young, military age males. According to a recent Pew poll 73% are males [Number of refugees to Europe surges to record 1.3 million in 2015, by Philip Connor, Pew Research Center, August 2, 2016]. And of course the surge in mass Third-World immigration has correlated with alarming increases in incidents of rape, particularly in more lenient countries like Germany and Sweden.
In Muslim occupied cities like Oslo, Norway recent police statistics have shown, “100 percent of assault rapes between strangers were committed by immigrant, non-Western males. And nine out of 10 of their victims were native Norwegian women. “
According to the German Federal Criminal Police Office, “During the first three quarters of 2016, migrants committed 2,790 sex crimes, or around ten per day” [Germany’s migrant rape crisis: January 2017, by Soeren Kern, Gatestone Institute, February 13, 2017].
And following a wave of sexual assaults by migrants in Cologne, Germany taxpayer dollars were used to teach migrants how to flirt with white German women [How one German town is teaching refugees about sex, flirting with local women, Fox News, October 6, 2016]. The purpose of this was to encourage them seduce the European women rather than outright raping them.
From the perspective of the survival of Europeans as a unique people, the consequences are the same.
Many Leftists acknowledge this decimation of white people around the globe and crack jokes like, “What are you saying it’s difficult being the minority in a country?” Of course, what is left unsaid is every other people in the world will still have their homelands. Whites, and only whites, will have nowhere to go.
The numbers do not lie. The double standards cannot be denied. The demonization and campaigns of hatred by the MSM are no longer even concealed. And the policies which replace whites through mass immigration, export their jobs through outsourcing, and make it unaffordable to start families are achieving their planned results. The governments of the West are waging a campaign of slow extermination against their own core populations. It is white genocide.
And those who resist should no longer shy away from calling it what it is.
Over the past few weeks we have seen case after case of anti-whitism. From the professor who declared his wish for Christmas was white genocide, to a group of 4 blacks who live streamed torturing a disabled white kid on facebook for being a Trump supporter. And each time, these incidents are dismissed and covered up.
Drexel university initially called the professors tweet “utterly reprehensible, deeply disturbing” later changing their statement to “protected speech” and choosing not to fire the professor. In a statement from the professor he wrote “White supremacy is on the rise, and we must fight it by any means. In that fight, universities will need to choose whether they are on the side of free expression and academic debate, or on the side of the racist mob.”
What’s hilarious about the professors statements is that there is no “free expression” or “academic debate” on campus. As Bob points out in the article below, any disagreement with the politically correct line is banned and the universities screamers and thugs shut down any debate.
I would ask each of you to join me in contacting Drexel University to demand an open discussion between the professor who called for White Genocide and Bob Whitaker. Will the university stand “on the side of free expression and academic debate”?
The Bizarro World of Anti-Whites by Bob Whitaker
We live in a Bizarro World, a world where White Genocide is being carried out in the name of “Diversity,” and any objection to this anti-white policy is banned.
In our Bizarro World, massive third world immigration into every WHITE country, and ONLY to WHITE countries, is official policy.
In our Bizarro world, General Wesley Clark declared that official American policy is to send troops to fight and die so that, “There is no room for an ethnically pure country in Europe.”
Immigration is only the first step in this genocidal policy. In every white country there Is a policy of FORCED racial assimilation. In 2008 the President of France declared officially that this program of racial intermarriage was going too slow, and he threatened to use force to speed it up.
All whites everywhere must be chased down.
This policy of chasing down a race is not completely new.
In the nineteenth century the United States passed a Fugitive Slave Act to chase down escaped blacks.
We now have a program to chase down fugitive whites. These escaping whites are called White Flight. Policy today demands that all White Flyers be chased down.
The Southern Poverty Law Center has declared that there are too many whites in Northern Idaho. They are raising money to chase them down with non-whites. Yes it sounds insane, but it is official policy today.
But there is one big difference between the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 and today’s Fugitive White Policy.
Back then, Africans were allowed to condemn the Fugitive Slave Act. But no one is allowed to breathe a word against the policy of chasing down and ending the white race.
Applied to any other race but whites, this Bizarro Policy would be described as genocide. The Australian Prime Minister declared that the aborigines were being subjected to quote “genocide by assimilation,” which is exactly what is being done to whites.
But no criticism of white genocide by immigration and assimilation is allowed anywhere on earth. In our Bizarro world, criticism of our fugitive white policy is crushed.
Anyone who dares to question this Bizarro anti-white despotism is attacked by the three groups I call Screamers, Thugs and Thought Police.
Screamers are there to shout down any questioning of white genocide. They shout words like “Nazi!” “White Supremacist!” “Racist!” and “White Separatist!” One minute they scream for diversity because there are too many white people and the next minute they scream there is no such thing as white people.
Anti-white screamers do not have to make any sense. They just have to make noise.
Then there are the rulers of all our colleges, the thugs.
The thugs are the white version of the Polar Bear Hunting done by black thugs. They control all campuses. If a speaker might question white genocide, they simply threaten to riot and the speaker is banned by the faculty “to prevent trouble.”
But screamers and thugs are all they can use in America. In Europe and other countries they have their anti-white thugs and screamers, but mostly they just use good old fashioned Thought Police and iron bars to suppress dissent. In Sweden, any criticism of any immigration policy gets you slapped into prison.
White genocide is being forced and any objection to it is attacked by the Screamers, Thugs and Thought Police.
Despite all this noise and violence and Stalinist law, I choose to speak out.
I invented the Mantra and the term White Genocide.
I have slowly developed a meme which at least objects to the screamers, thugs and thought police. The anti-whites are finally admitting that the terms “anti-white” and “white genocide” actually exist.
We are in the last country on earth where only the screamers and thugs try to silence me. This is the only country where I can challenge any of you Bizarro anti-whites to debate or question me.
I doubt seriously any of the anti-whites will show up if they don’t have their thugs with them.
All I want for Christmas is White Genocide
The offending Tweeter was George Ciccariello-Maher, a professor of politics and global studies at Philadelphia’s Drexel University. He doubled down on Christmas Day:
To clarify: when the whites were massacred during the Haitian Revolution, that was a good thing indeed.
But in the midst of a backlash, he said he was just kidding because—haw!—there’s no such thing as white genocide:
On Christmas Eve, I sent a satirical tweet about an imaginary concept, ‘white genocide’…an idea invented by white supremacists and used to denounce everything from interracial relationships to multicultural policies….It is a figment of the racist imagination.
Ciccariello-Maher’s own words—in which he repeatedly takes a sadistic glee in the notion of violent white extinction—reveal he is absolutely full of shit. He wrote a 2014 paper called “‘So Much the Worse for the Whites’: Dialectics of the Haitian Revolution” in which he argues that the wholesale slaughter of Haiti’s white inhabitants was a righteous act leading toward “universal emancipation,” and we all know how well that all worked out for Haiti.
In 2013, the mystifyingly employed professor stated “Yacub made a lot of white folks,” citing a brain-damaged theory of the Nation of Islam that an evil black professor created white people roughly 6,000 years ago.
In 2015, he wrote, “Abolish the White Race.”
In 2016 he wrote about an alleged conversation with his son, whom daddy has apparently brainwashed to the point where sonny-boy is talking about poisoning white people. Late in the year Ciccariello-Maher wrote about sending “Racist Crackers” to gulags.
Pardon me for noticing that it all sounds mighty genocidal, whitey.
Belching out the sort of logic-defying, obfuscatory nonsense that has been a hallmark of their flailing attempts at discourse for generations now, Ciccariello-Maher’s supporters claimed since there’s no such thing as “white people,” there could not possibly be anything such as “white genocide.”
Mind you, these are the same dolts who openly gloat that “White America Is Dying,” citing demographic trends they insist are inevitable.
So in other words, even though white people don’t exist, it’s a good thing that they’re dying out, and you’re a racist if you don’t understand that.
Part of the reason so many people snort and guffaw at the notion of white genocide is that the term “genocide” itself is generally understood as something that happens quickly, openly, and violently. It is not conceived as something that happens gradually as a result of deliberate demographic meddling by the powers that be.
But according to Raphael Lemkin, who is credited with coining the term “genocide” after World War II:
Genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation….It is intended to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves….The objectives of such a plan would be the disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion….
Proponents of the “white genocide” hypothesis claim that this is precisely what’s happening in Western countries—and only Western countries—through loose immigration policies and nonstop voodoo propaganda about the moral turpitude of not only white people—who, again, don’t really exist—but the very notion of whiteness.
They claim that the mass infusion of nonwhite populations into Europe and the United States—which has never been democratically approved of by any of the host populations and has instead been foisted upon them—violate this passage in 1948’s United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide:
Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.
The howling double standard—i.e., the fact that no one is forcing Africa, Asia, or Israel to “diversify” while cramming diversity into every majority-white nation on earth—has led to Robert Whitaker’s famous phrase “Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”
One way you can tell a really classy writer is her use of novel, creative terminology.
You can tell the writer of this title is a real pro who works hard to be original.
I have yet to see one single establishment article even mention the rioting at Trump rallies by anti-whites.
But sometimes when the right to peaceable assembly is violated, it is just plain evil:
The anti-white … stands up fearlessly for free assembly when it is used for anti-white causes:
“The permitted, lawful rally, put on by the Community Alliance of Lane County, Standing Up for Racial Justice and the NAACP as well as the Springfield Alliance for Equality and Respect outside Willamalane Center, was “in reaction to increasing levels of racist, xenophobic, homophobic, Islamophobic, anti-Semitic and classist activity happening in Lane County,” the Community Alliance of Lane County said. “There have been more Confederate flags seen in the area, vandalism targeting Asian owned businesses, a truck driving around with neo-Nazi and white supremacist messages on it and more.”
With this innovative terminology the article shows the police moving in on this Giant Marr Thing and an arrest document showing that those same police who are absent when one or two pro-whites appear with signs saying “white genocide,” fearlessly show up in force when a dangerous giant like Marr threatens to stamp out real protesters really peaceably assembling to denounce whites.
Self-styled “professionals” who have NEVER ONCE mentioned free speech in relation to any violence against any pro-white show their dedication to American Principles when anti-whites protest in their own professional way:
They go hysterical.
And this article is pure hysteria.
No one but me will mention that.
Even before Angela Merkel flooded Germany with Arab immigrants, there were lots of Turks living in German cities who chose to live among other Turks and form Turkish areas.
Since taking in over 1.5 million Arabs from 2014, German citizens are starting to fear for the future of their country, as Muslim groups claim the banning of alcohol in Germany will stop sex attacks by foreigners.
Now that German cities have been colossally devastated, Karl-Friedrich Thoene, a member of Thuringia’s ministry of infrastructure and agriculture, says that German towns and villages should be turned into an “integration laboratory“, where German people are the test subjects.
“The rural regions are a laboratory of integration,” he said, “there can be no parallel societies in rural areas.”
“The village community is the ideal chance for integration.”
Thoene said that “we need incentives to persuade the migrants to stay [in rural areas].”
Gudrun Kirchhoff, from the German Institute of Urban Affairs, agreed with Thoene’s plan, saying that lower cost of living, cheaper rents and tight-knit communities are “factors of success“.
The anti-White elite say that we need immigration because we have a low birth rate and will not have enough workers. This is a lie.
Western countries do not need low-skilled labor, because by around 2030, an estimated 50% of all today’s workers will be replaced by robots; especially low-skilled jobs.
So why does Germany REALLY need to bring in millions of non-German Arabs and Africans, and then “integrate” them?
The elite is anti-White, and for some reason, they want to turn White areas into minority White areas.
They call it “diversity”, but they are only targeting White areas. “Diversity” is actually their code word for White genocide.
What they are doing is the crime of genocide. If Black areas were targeted for mass non-Black immigration, all because they were labelled “too Black” – that would also be genocide.
Well, this is White genocide – and it’s wrong.
I borrowed a lot from Greg Johnson’s essay, Dealing with the Holocaust, which I think is important for a deeper understanding of the issue in general and for the position I advocate.
This may seem counter-intuitive, but a common mistake pro-White advocates make in combating White genocide is disputing the alleged facts of anti-White historical narratives.
By challenging the details of anti-White historical narratives, whether it be the Holocaust, the Black slave trade, genocide of American Indians or the various other alleged crimes committed by Whites against non-White populations, pro-White advocates are missing and implicitly accepting—the “premise: If white racism, nationalism, self-assertion, etc. led to the holocaust, the slave trade, Jim Crow, etc., then they are evil”—the underlying mechanism used to justify White genocide.
A far more effective point of argument is that regardless of the (alleged) crimes committed by White people in the past, they do not justify White genocide or any of its anti-White components.
Besides actually being a morally true statement, it registers as such to the vast majority of White people who were taught since childhood that, “Two wrongs don’t make a right.” This is a far more effective approach than trying to convince someone to question the historical “facts” that influenced the formation of their worldview and/or understanding of the world. Greg Johnson points out that
As a general rule, moral and political arguments are more convincing than historical or scientific arguments, because the latter require specialized knowledge and lengthy explanations, whereas the former can be pithily formulated and draw upon common moral and political intuitions—and generally people’s moral intuitions are healthier than the toxic moral swill ladled out by the churches, schools, and mass media.
Not only is it more effective and efficient, but it also works for every anti-White historical narrative anti-Whites use, and any more that may be invented in the future. So not only does the average White person we are trying to reach not need to spend hours researching a specific historical instance to justify what he feels is right, it also inoculates him against all other and future attempts at manipulation via anti-White historical narratives.
Additionally—and this is important—it brings the focus back to the present genocidal conditions faced by our people. It interrupts the autistic proclivity to get lost in the past and technicalities that understandably bore and annoy most people. We cannot afford to get distracted and bogged down in the past and lengthy explanations. We need that lightning focus that clearly and succinctly defeats anti-White arguments, exposing them for what they are. If we can do that and simultaneously help inoculate White people against this powerful demoralizing weapon, why wouldn’t we?
It is our own people’s grandiose propensity toward collective guilt and self-abasement that is the ultimate source of the power anti-White narratives have over us. To borrow further from Greg Johnson’s excellent essay, attacking the moral dimension of the problem is like hacking at the trunk of a tree, whereas revising historical narratives is akin to merely trimming the branches.
Once we have stopped the genocide of our people, our historians can determine what was true in the past. Until then, I encourage all of my fellow pro-White advocates to stop trimming the branches and join me in hacking away at the trunk.